
The context of this regret is significant. Nadal entered the final with a formidable record, having conquered two of the previous three Grand Slam tournaments and boasting a remarkable 26-match hard-court winning streak. His opponent, Stan Wawrinka, had already made waves by defeating Novak Djokovic, the tournament’s second seed, setting the stage for an unexpected upset. However, a pre-match back injury threw Nadal’s game into disarray. Despite the pain, Nadal’s unwavering spirit compelled him to play, a decision he later described as difficult but driven by respect for the crowd, his opponent, and himself.
The loss to Wawrinka not only denied Nadal another Australian Open title but also delayed his pursuit of a double career Grand Slam, a feat he eventually achieved in 2022. This particular match stands out as a poignant reminder that even the most formidable athletes are vulnerable, and that circumstances beyond their control can alter the course of history.
While Nadal’s legacy is often defined by his clay-court mastery, his hard-court prowess is undeniable. He reached the Australian Open final six times, a testament to his versatility, though he faced losses to Djokovic, Federer, and, notably, Wawrinka. The 2014 final, therefore, represents a unique “what if” in Nadal’s illustrious career, a moment where a physical setback potentially altered a significant chapter in his pursuit of tennis immortality. The match serves as a stark reminder that even a player of Nadal’s caliber is subject to the unpredictable nature of sport, and that even the greatest players have matches they wished they could replay.